This weekend marks the new beginning of Daylight Savings Time. This is being widely publicized because the date was moved up and we will need to change all our systems and clocks manually. Even time comes with an expiration date.
Open your refrigerator and you will see a number of products from milk, to fresh squeezed orange juice, to opened jam: all with an imprinted expiration date. Soda and water come with a "bottled on" date on the containers.
Now go to your medicine cabinet and you find a lot of the same: boxes, (if you're like me very few), containing various pain relievers and cough syrups -- all with their nicely imprinted expiration date. All these products communicate a set of expectations: they will be good for a certain period of time and then you will need to replace them.
What do you experience when you come back from a trip and find that you forgot to dispose of that carton of milk? You throw it away without a second thought. The same happens with medications, especially with those.
Now tell me what happens when your appliance, let's say your water heater goes. Hopefully no harm done, you expected it because everyone knows that a heating coil sitting in water inside a heavy steel tank can last only so long before it corrodes beyond the sacrificial anode rod. Same for roof tiles: you know what the deal is when you make your purchase.
Consumers learned about some of these times from the manufacturers *and* from helpful neighbors and friends, including Consumer Reports. What happens when you make a purchase and do not have that critical piece of information at that time? Would an expiration date make a difference in your buying habits?
My iPod battery just gave in completely: it won't hold a charge at all. I was not an early adopter; I bought it in July 2006, just before I started blogging. It helps me time my running, including the sprints on specific songs of my playlist, and I need it to stay on for a little over one hour at a time. The staff at Best Buy asked me quickly if I wanted to pay for a warranty plan on the device, less than $50, I remember him saying. I was clueless and answered politely that there was no need.
Well, as it turns out there is, isn't there? Now my experience is very diminished by the hassle of having to give up the device for a length of time to have the battery refitted, etc. I'm not sure I'm comfortable with the fact that I might get a "used" iPod back while mine was new. Maybe it's another way to encourage customers to engage the "I want, now" button and go buy a new device.
My experience is not unique, somehow my expectations where not managed well on the onset. And now I'm feeling a bit cheated. If you consider that I come from a culture where Cathedrals from centuries past are still standing, I do wonder about our post industrialist culture. Everything is more convenient, yet things last much less so we can sell more. What do you think?
valeria, in a world where wal-mart rules we have to find our own niche. the old tag value for money is still true: you buy something today, pay almost nothing and get back to replace it in few months.
lately, some italian fashion brands begun to bring back their production in italy. mid 90s the trend was to go to produce in china, india, east europe countries, but quality was suffering.
Posted by: gianandrea facchini | March 14, 2007 at 03:45 AM
Gianandrea:
You're onto something. Speed is more easily measurable than quality. Perhaps we've reduced productivity to a series of box-checking activities that could potentially be done by anyone -- to the detriment of the quiet tasting and truly experienced eye of the connoisseur.
If we go back to your great posts about luxury goods, part of what we crave for are those delicate experiences. Those instances in which we feel part of an elite *because* what we experience is rare. Quality used to be the hallmark of craftsmanship. Could things be rebalanced back? Are our expectations so reduced that normal support is seen as extraordinary effort?
Posted by: Valeria Maltoni | March 12, 2007 at 10:33 AM
ann, the definition disposable economy is great.
valeria, this post of yours is getting so entangled with mine about time. i just posted an answer to your comment. speed replaced quality because is in someway more accountable. our world seems to depend upon quantitative measure and to have lost the capability to define quality. how many of you have ever tried the fabric of a sweater before purchasing it? or ask to taste a cheese before buying it?
Posted by: gianandrea facchini | March 12, 2007 at 03:05 AM