« 5 Marketing Ideas You Can Use Today | Main | Can Blue Cross Give Race Customers a Choice? »

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c03bb53ef01156f71ddfa970c

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference The Future of Journalism: Content Marketing :

Comments

Bruce Christensen

If some of these talented people would create a list of their knowledge specialties and then all join together in a directory, I bet they would have a lot of work come their way.

A network like Linkedin could provide the source directory for companies to browse for help in creating content.

Jeff Hurt

Yes, this sounds like a great direction for journalists. There are many small business owners who could use content creators and communicators to help them tell their stories, share their services and broadcast the right messages.

I have a communication/journalist friend who has been looking for a job for several months and I encouraged him to start a blog. He has such great writing and communication skills that I thought he should showcase those skills. He's gone one step further and started creating a group of writers who share similar interests and histories. He's still job hunting but people are beginning to see him as a leader.

Interesting how these times have created new tribes, new leaders, new strategies and new visions. Journalists unite!

Mark Joyella

Insightful post. The hurdle, in my experience, for a journo like myself to bring my writing and storytelling skills to marketing or anyplace outside a newsroom is that many "creative" companies are locked in rigid fill-in-the-blank thinking. PR companies hire PR people, not good writers. Marketing companies want to see your work as a marketing exec, not your brilliantly written story on a deep, difficult topic. They seem highly resistant to taking the (in my opinion) short leap from what they always do, to bringing in a trained analyst and writer whose very job has always been to figure out something new and explain it well to mass audiences.

I've had some frustrating interviews. In the meantime, like Bruce's journo friend, I blog.

Mark

Karen Hegmann

Valeria

Great post and I find Jeff's and Mark's comments to be interesting as well.

I'm in the opposite situation as Mark experience-wise in that I was trained as a marketer/communicator, but thrive as a business writer. A lot of communications positions state that they want someone with a journalism degree, but I don't always listen to what's advertised. If the duties are interesting and similar to what I've done before, I apply anyway.
I do agree that most companies are stuck with rigid thinking and tend to see things with "tunnel vision." It's unfortunate as the demands on people in today's workplace require a different kind of thinking. I believe that a good journalist could thrive in any environment as they have the skills needed to dig deep to find out what's relevent to a story. Unfortunately, many business owners don't see things from this point of view and they're missing out on hiring some really great people.

Sloane Kelley

I would also add audio and video skills to the content mix. Multimedia is super important these days. Coming out of broadcast journalism school, I was fortunate enough to fall into the world of content creation, where I still am today. Journalists, whether from a print or broadcast background, can bring a lot to the corporate table: in-depth research skills, an understanding of how to talk with people in a non-PR speak way, and a diverse mix of experiences and knowledge.

Valeria Maltoni

@Bruce - that is a terrific idea. I already mentioned it in conversations with a couple of journalists today.

@Jeff - imagine a bureau where you can hire journalists to help you with your content. When you get a chance, do pass along the information about your friend. I talk to a lot of people in a week...

@Mark - you're mostly right. But there are some leaders who actually do appreciate and support thinkers and writers. Sometimes it's hard to get to them through the "normal" or expected channels as they are surrounded by people whose job is to screen you out. Or at least they think it is. My suggestion is not to give up. Don't accept what others think your reality is. Create one for yourself. It may and will require you to go above and beyond, but that's why those who do the work succeed. They actually do it.

@Karen - cannot help companies that are stuck in a rut, they need to help themselves. Meanwhile, we can make the others thrive. It's my experience that we can never change anyone aside ourselves. And even that is pretty hard. The other disappointing discovery of corporate America is that there really is no appreciation for people with skills that differ from the manager's style. That's probably why a lot of work looks and feels cookie cutter.

@Sloane - excellent thought, thank you. Writing content for this blog over the (almost) part three years and curating a community, I can tell I learned a lot from the experience. I'm not quite organized to do videos and podcasts, yet, but it's a matter of time.

Rob Leavitt

Hi Valeria,

I agree that content marketing might be the future for a great many former and would-be journalists -- and smart companies should absolutely be looking aggressively these days to hire them.

But woe is us if this is literally the future of "journalism." I'm a big believer in news blogging, citizen journalism, and the like, but we desperately need to find ways to sustain serious, non-corporate-driven journalism that informs and educates us all on matters great and small -- and, not incidentally, "comforts the afflicted and afflicts the comfortable," as the old saying goes. Content marketing won't do that, and we don't have to look far around the world to see the negative consequences of countries lacking a robust independent press.

atul chatterjee

I have friends who keep their job as writers in journalism (not editors) and provide content.
The main difference they find is that they have to be much sharper in their writing. They can't really give a story a good build up.
On the other hand most are quite happy with this situation since they say they do not have to add fluff.

Valeria Maltoni

@Rob - I wasn't being literal, no. It would indeed be a shame if the news business killed journalism. I think the most powerful form of information is reporting of what is happening and the facts surround it with the ability to present context so that informed citizens and democracies can form an opinion and act on the news. Should journalists take the matter into their own hands to discover and support that kind of journalism? Would we respond positively if we could see through the veils of interest that the business part of news is using as filter between us and the news? At this time we probably have many more questions than we have answers... good points all.

@Atul - I'm a bit lost in your comment. They need to be sharper in the writing of content for which purpose? News reporting?

The comments to this entry are closed.

be your own boss

Outposts

Conversations


Comment Policy

  • This is my blog and not a public space. Critical discourse is welcomed. I will, however, delete your comment if you descend into personal attacks, inappropriate language, disrespectful behavior, or excessive self-promotion and link-baiting.

Book Reviews


Disclaimer

  • The opinions blogged herein represent only those of Valeria Maltoni and do not reflect those of her employer, persons or companies mentioned herein, or anyone else.

© Valeria Maltoni

  • Creative Commons License


  • Conversation AgentTM

  • © 2006-2013 Valeria Maltoni.

Subscribe

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

Marketing that makes business sense


Advisory Boards


As seen on

Conversation Agent on Facebook