You might also adapt this list to marketing - everything a business does is marketing at the end of the day. The forms you ask your customers to fill out, the minutes they wait in line, the dizzying phone recoding systems are all part of your company's brand.
Few organizations are starting to pay attention to those experiences and coming up with new solutions.
In mind of the innovator: taming the traps of traditional thinking, Matt May writes about the seven sins of solutions.
Traditional ways of thinking prevent us from divining the most accurate—and elegant—of solutions to any problem solving situation, he writes. How would those ideas play in customer service?
(1.) Shortcutting - making a beeline for the solution without first analyzing the root cause of the problem could lead you to drawing the wrong conclusions. Our brain is trained to jump to conclusions, to take shortcuts, and experience compounds that trait. However, it is also experience that teaches us that root cause analysis is helpful to know which questions you're answering.
Incidentally, when you start thinking about problems differently, you also come up with entirely new ways of doing things, which may lead to significant innovation in customer care.
(2.) Blind spots - these are part of our mental narrative, our assumptions given previous experience. We fill in to complete our existing mental patterns. If your part of the conversation is pre-filled, where does that leave the other party?
What assumptions do you have in approaching customer calls and customer service situations? How are these assumption preventing you from actually addressing the issue?
(3.) Not invented here - by nature, we don't trust other people's solutions. Period. See if you identify yourself with this situation. You have an idea that you think will save the company costs in the long run and will make customers really happy. You propose the idea and it falls flat.
Two months later, a consultant comes in to work with the top team and they come up with the very same idea... and this time it gets adopted, because it was the top group's idea and it took time and an investment with a third party to flesh it out.
(4.) Satisficing - this is a challenge of our times, there is no incubation period for ideas, we need to implement right away. In case you were wondering, satisfice is the combination of satisfy and suffice, a term economist and Nobel laureate Herbert a. Simon coined in his 1957 Models of Man to describe the typical human decision-making process by which we go with the first option that offers an acceptable payoff.
Is your customer service a base minimum requirement kind of activity? Are you asking the right questions or trying to provide the quickest answers?
(5.) Downgrading - this is the close cousin of the previous one, with a twist: a formal revision of the goal or situation. Here you twist and sift the facts to suit your solution. Or you provide a “revised estimate" that gets you off the hook from providing a real resolution.
When you downgrade the problem, you have the comfort of thinking that you can do that with the solution as well. That is rarely the case.
(6.) Complicating - our brains are wired to make things more complicated that they are. We add - cost and complexity - naturally and consistently. The first instinct when someone gives us a problem to solve is to start compounding it with information that leads us astray.
We hoard, store, collect, and accumulate behavior.
(7.) Stifling - this is the most unproductive and destructive of all sins. It can prevent someone from trying at all. In some organizations, most ideas are killed before they even get a chance to be shared. See if you've heard this before - this is not the way we do things here; that's never been done; customers won't go for that; we don't have time to do it.
The best one of all might be - we're going through a recession right now... Ba-bing, idea killed. What is your favorite way of killing ideas? How have your ideas been killed most frequently? Are you the number one person responsible for your ideas not getting done?
These are all ways to either openly say no, or to avoid thinking differently altogether. Today at Fast Company Expert blog we discuss how a slight change in thinking has allowed Intuit to put customers front and center by offering them a service that helps them stay current. In return, Intuit collects free tips and advice from a roster of tax specialists that help the company improve its products.
[image of 7 colors for 7 days by Davic]















Excellent simple treatise on what not to do. The most prevalent of the seven I have seen are downgrading and complicating.
Nothing is worse then receiving one level of customer service in one place and receiving an entirely different experience somewhere else. The experience needs to be uniform...otherwise the good one won't matter.
Complicating from automation is brutal. I usually just angrily mash the # key til I get an actual person.
Posted by: Stuart Foster | June 22, 2009 at 09:56 AM
Valeria, few years ago, we had a meeting with some trainers who were trying to change some of the above habits. The most memorable exercise was the follow:
they gave us a paper with some instruction written on, the first one was to carefully read the paper and follow instructions. Some of them were really weird, such as jump on the chair, etc.
The room soon became a huge mess of people acting as mad.
The happy few who read the entire paper got to the last line saying: don't do anything of the above and remained sat on their chairs.
And yes, we sometimes are to in hurry to sit and think and believe that acting will save time but it is thinking that will save time and money.
Posted by: gianandrea | June 22, 2009 at 10:28 AM
Hi Valeria,
Great post. I think what it really all comes down to is Giving Customers What They Really Want. A couple of years back I wrote a book on this subject and in my experiences and research customers really just want a company that meets and sometimes exceeds their expectations.
Things like showing up or calling when you say you're going to. Following through.
Getting the job done without making the customer's life difficult. As in, just give us the order and everything will be taken care of. Or connecting you with a real person almost immediately instead of listening to 10 minutes of dialing choices.
Being friendly by smiling or making the customer feel welcomed and warmed.
Companies that just do these simple things systematically stand head and shoulders above most.
Add to this a little dose of going above and beyond, showing your customers that you really care for them and exceeding their expectations - and not only will you have a loyal customer for life - they'll be your biggest fan and rave to all their friends about you.
Posted by: Michael Zipursky | June 22, 2009 at 02:29 PM
Valeria--
Great post. The first is the most relevant to me--the idea that we head for the solution first and don't take time to really find out what's at the root of the issue. To me, the analogy is like telling the person complaining of headache to take an aspirin, when tests would reveal he actually has a brain tumor.
Get to the root of the issue, in short!
Posted by: Heidi Miller | June 22, 2009 at 03:27 PM
@Stuart - it's amazing how much less cumbersome actually talking with a customer has become these days. You have the opportunity to ask more questions, elicit information, and build rapport. It turns out that the human touch is the least expensive of all systems.
@Gianandrea - great example of leaping to conclusions and working from assumptions! Thank you.
@Michael - what's interesting is that sometimes going above and beyond means being informed about the person you're talking with, learning to listen more, and being helpful, Not, as many assume, giving away the barn. Congratulations on your book, I know how hard that process is!
@Heidi - is it all the talk about adding value? Do people feel that jumping to conclusions and being seeing in action is the valuable option? Is volume better than quality? Does volume equal conversion? In my experience there is no direct correlation. And yet... good example. Thank you.
Posted by: Valeria Maltoni | June 23, 2009 at 09:22 AM
great,the sin which I was able to relate the most was the last one, stifling.
I am not in an organisation, I am Studying but whenever I come up with some new idea and share it with my team-mates or teachers, I hear very familiar response , 'can't be done', 'see it later' et al. And sometimes I kill my ideas myself either due to laziness of I can foresee what's their fate gonna be.
Posted by: gaurav jain | June 24, 2009 at 09:42 AM